Hyerdahl1 wrote:
> >Subject: Re: Dr. Laura on Sex in Marriage
> >From: "Society" Society{at}feminism.is.invalid
> >Date: 4/20/2004 5:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time
> >Message-id: 
> >
> >"Hyerdahl1"  wrote in message
> >news:20040417135444.24279.00000033{at}mb-m02.aol.com...
> >>
> If you beleive that women enjoy sex as much as men, then to withhold
sex, would
> be a punishment to both.
> >
> >Given the numbers of women who withhold sex>from their men to
manipulate their
> men, however>much a typical woman enjoys sex she enjoys>manipulating
her man
> more.  So, Dr.Laura enjoins
> >women against their carnal desires to use "sex to>punish and
control".
> >http://www.women-together.com/married.htm
>
> Again, in denying men sex, if women enjoy it as much they would be
cutting off
> their noses to spite their faces.  :-)

INDEED!

And this explains why feminists, in particular, are so nasty and
angry and hateful of men: They are sexually frustrated bittergirls.

> >> If you believe that women do not enjoy sex as much> or as often as
men, then
> you must believe that sex is something women should OFFER to men in
order>> to
> be nice girls. :-)
> >
> >I do not see how your consequent follows from>your antecedent.
However, I do
> see that you>dislike being "nice" as well as resenting any
expectation that you
> fulfill your obligationsto your man even tho' you expect to
collect>on his
> obligations to you.
>
> Well, perhaps women just have their own agendas and don't consider
marriage the
> right for men to have sex.  :-)

Why shouldn't men have the right to have sex?  Don't feminists argue
that pro-lifers are trying to deny women the right to have sex?  Or
that
bad Patriarchal men were selfish and had their own agenda that sought
to exclude women?

On the contrary: We discover that men are sexually liberated beings
who seek to include women in their lives and plans.  It's not the
religious
right that seeks to deny people sexuality, but the prudish and
bittergirl
feminists who find sex disgusting.  Thanks for clearing that all up.

> In that regard, sex is voluntary and not
> payment for something, or consideration as in a contract.

So what?  A woman choosing to be a housewife and have servants
clean her home while she "sacrifices" to play tennis also is
engaging in a voluntary choice.  All it takes for something
to be a legal contract is for the proper authorities to recognize it.

For example, our elected President GW Bush, who understands the
US constitution, is teaching all Americans the value of voting.
I think that's a good thing. :-)  Feminists can see their tax
dollars go to rich white men.  If they don't like it, they can
vote against those social programs. :-)

regards,
Mark Sobolewski
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 1/12/05 2:57:05 PM