* Crossposted from: FREEDOM'S_VOICE
Gun Control, Patriotism, and Civil Disobedience
By Jacob G. Hornberger
ISIL EDUCATIONAL PAMPHLET SERIES
----------------------------------------------------------------
The State of California recently enacted a law which requires owners
of semiautomatic weapons to register their guns with the State. But
when the law went into effect, thousands of California gun owners,
although risking a felony conviction, refused to comply with its
requirements. 
These gun owners were immediately showered with harsh criticism, not
only from their public officials, but from their fellow citizens as
well. The critics implied, among other things, that since the law had
been passed by the duly elected representatives of the people, the gun
owners, as members of society, had a duty to comply with its terms.
The controversy raised important issues concerning liberty, property,
government, patriotism, and civil disobedience.
As I have repeatedly emphasized, by adopting the welfare-state,
planned-economy way of life, the American people of our time have
rejected and abandoned the principles of individual freedom and limited
government upon which our nation was founded. But they have also
rejected and abandoned something of equal importance: the concept of
patriotism which characterized America's Founding Fathers.
There have been two different notions of patriotism in American
history. The one which characterizes the American people of the 20th
century - the one which is taught in our public schools - is this:
patriotism means the support of one's own government and the actions
which the government takes on behalf of the citizenry. The idea is that
since we live in a democratic society, the majority should have the
political power to take any action it desires. And although those in
the minority may not like the laws , they are duty-bound as "good"
citizens to obey and support them. 
The distinguishing characteristic of this type of patriotism is that
the citizen does not make an independent, personal judgement of the
rightness or wrongness of a law. Instead, he does what he has been
taught to do since the first grade in his government schools: he places
unwavering faith and trust in the judgement of his popularly-elected
public officials. 
The other concept of patriotism was the type which characterized the
British colonists during the late 1700s. These individuals believed
that patriotism meant a devotion to certain principles of rightness and
morality. They believed that the good citizen had the duty to make an
independent judgement as to whether or not his own government's laws
violated these principles. And so, unlike their counterparts in
America today, these individuals refused to automatically accept the
legitimacy of the actions of their public officials.
Let us examine how dramatically the "real world" applications of these
two concepts of patriotism differ.
In the late 1700s, the British colonists suffered under the same kind
of oppressive regulations and taxes that present-day Americans endure.
What was the reaction of the colonists to this regulatory and tax
tyranny? They deliberately chose to ignore and disobey their
government's regulations and tax acts. Smuggling and tax-evasion were
the order of the day! And the more that their government tried to
enforce the restrictions, the more it met with resistance and
disobedience from the citizenry. 
Sometimes smugglers or tax evaders would be caught and brought to
trial. The result? Despite conclusive evidence of guilt and the judges
instructions too convict, the defendants' fellow citizens on the
juries regularly voted verdicts of acquittal.
And civil disobedience was not limited to economic regulations and
taxation. There was also widespread resistance to conscription,
especially during the French and Indian Wars. Those who were
conscripted deserted the army in large numbers. And those who had not
been conscripted hid the deserters in their homes.
This was what it once meant to be a patriot -- the devotion to a
certain set of principles regarding rightness, morality, individualism,
liberty, and property; and it meant a firm stand against one's own
government when it violated these principles.
If an American of today were magically transported back to colonial
America of the late 1700s, he would immediately find himself at odds
with the colonists who were resisting the tyranny of their government.
How do we know this? By the way which Americans of today respond to
what is a much more oppressive and tyrannical economic system - with
either meekness or, even worse, with ardent "flag-waving" support for
the actions of their rulers.
And what is their attitude toward their fellow citizens who are caught
violating the rules and regulations? Again, either meekness or fervent
support of the rulers. After all, what was their reaction to the
Internal Revenue Service's seizure of Willie Nelson's property? "I'll
make a small donation but otherwise don't get me involved - I don't
want them coming after me!" And to the conviction of Michael Milken for
violating economic regulations that were so ridiculous that even King
George would have been embarrassed? "He got what's coming to him -
shouldn't have made so much money anyway!" And to Leona Helmsley's
conviction for having taken improper deductions on her income tax
return? "She's obnoxious - she should go to jail." The thought of
rising to the defense of these victims of political tyranny is anathema
to the present-day American "patriot." 
And what about jury trials involving economic crimes? Like the good,
little citizens they have been taught to be in the public school
system, American "patriots" dutifully comply with the judge's
instructions to convict fellow citizens caught up in this regulatory
and tax tyranny. Although they have the same power as their ancestors
to disregard the judge's instructions and to acquit their fellow
citizens, the thought of doing so is so repugnant to present-day
"patriots" that they choose to do their "duty" and thereby become
"patriotic" agents of their own government's tyranny. 
Therefore, there is no doubt that the American of today would feel
very uncomfortable if, all of a sudden, he found himself in the British
colonies in 1775 - in the midst of smugglers, tax-evaders,
draft-resisters, and other patriots of the time.
This brings us back to the individual in California who are refusing
to register their guns.
As our American ancestors understood so well, the bedrock of a free
society is private ownership of property. And there are fewer more
important rights of private ownership than the unfettered right to own
weapons. 
Why is ownership of weapons so vitally important? Not for hunting. And
not even to resist aggression by domestic criminals or foreign
invaders. No, as history has repeatedly shown, the vital importance of
the fundamental right to won arms is to resist tyranny by one's own
government, should such tyranny ever become unendurably evil and
oppressive. 
The lesson which Americans of today have forgotten or have never
learned - the lesson which our ancestors tried so hard to teach us - is
that the greatest threat to our lives, liberty, property, and security
lies not with some foreign government, as our rulers so often tell us;
instead the greatest threat to our freedom and well-being lies with our
own government! 
Of course, there are those who suggest that democratically-elected
public officials would never do anything to seriously harm the American
people. But let's look at just a few twentieth-century examples: They
confiscated people's gold. They repudiated gold clauses in government
debts. They provoked the Japanese into attacking Pearl Harbor and then
acted like they were surprised. They incarcerated Japanese-Americans
for no crime at all. They injected dangerous, mind-altering drugs into
American servicemen without their knowledge. They radiated the American
people in the Pacific Northwest and then deliberately hid this
information from them. They have surreptitiously confiscated and
plundered people's income and savings through the Federal Reserve
System. They have plundered and terrorized the citizenry through the
IRS. And, most recently, they have sent our fellow citizens to their
deaths thousands of miles away in the pursuit of a relatively
insignificant cause. 
Those who believe that democratically-elected rulers lack the
potential and inclination for destructive conduct against their
citizenry are living in la-la land.
Of course, the proponents of political tyranny are usually
well-motivated. Those who enacted the gun-registration law in
California point to criminals who have used semiautomatic weapons to
commit horrible, murderous acts. But the illusion - the pipe-dream - is
that bad acts can be prevented by the deprivation of liberty. They
cannot be! Life is insecure - whether under liberty or enslavement. The
only choice is between liberty and insecurity, on the one hand, and
insecurity and enslavement on the other. 
The true patriot scrutinizes the actions of his own government with
unceasing vigilance. And when his government violates the morality and
rightness associated with principles of individual freedom and private
property, he immediately rises in opposition to his government. This
is why the gun owners of California might ultimately go down in history
as among the greatest and most courageous patriots of our time.
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of the Future of Freedom
Foundation, P.O. Box 9752, Denver, Colorado 80209. Tel: (303)
777-3558. 
YOUR RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE IS UNDER SIEGE! Know your rights -
read... THAT EVERY MAN BE ARMED: The Evolution of a Constitutional
Right by Stephen Halbrook
Learn how to counter today's misunderstandings of the right to keep
and bear arms as recognized in the 2nd Amendment of the Bill of
Rights. This comprehensive book details the history and philosophy of
arms ownership from ancient times through the present - from
Aristotle, Cicero, and Machiavelli, through Hobbes, Locke and
Rousseau. It tells of the Radical Whigs' support for a civilian
militia instead of a standing army. Traces the legal commentary &
judicial interpretations of the right to keep & bear arms and the
Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution through the 19th and 20th
centuries. 
For these and other books and tapes write: Freedom's Forum Books, 1800
Market Street, San Francisco, California 94102. Add $2.50 P & H for
1st book and $1.00 for each additional item.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Attractive two-color hard copies of this pamphlet are available for 5
cents each (minimum order $1.00). Price includes shipping.
This pamphlet is produced as a public service by the International
Society for Individual Liberty. If you would like to receive free
literature about ISIL's activities around the world, and receive a
sample copy of the FREEDOM NETWORK NEWS newsletter and book catalog,
please write: 
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY
1800 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94102
Tel: (415) 864-0952 Fax: (415) 864-7506
translated into html by Scott Banister [banister@uiuc.edu]
 ! Origin: CyberSupport Hq/Co.A (602)231-9377 PRN/FIDO/SURV/+(1:114/428)
Just thought I would stir the pot a little....gryn (CEC)
 Greymage on Dal.net IRC channels #greyhaven and #nightspell
 C.E. Copeland  Email 1:114/428 KeyId:9B8C4D79
               My opinions are solely my own...
... FREEDOM! - Sir William Wallace, 1272-1305. Scot. Patriot
---  * Tag-X Pro v1.30 on 17 *
--- FMail 1.22
---------------