From: "Geo." 

It's got a better task manager applet too, shows network stats besides cpu
usage. And it's got semifunctional zip folders and a few other nice
features that don't come close to countering the annoyance factor.

Geo.

"Paul Ranson"  wrote in message
news:3e429433$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> XP has better application memory management and monitoring. And you can
> attach a debugger to a process, and then detach it without exiting the
> debuggee. May not sound like much but that's the stuff that interests me
> this afternoon.
>
> Paul
>
> "Joe Barr"  wrote in message
> news:3e424e1f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > On Wed, 05 Feb 2003 21:04:31 +0000, Geo. wrote:
> >
> > > "John Cuccia"  wrote in message
> > > news:uv834vcvsiijjpgt3luods8n9l59j2k1l0{at}4ax.com...
> > >
> > >> Or "this product is absolutely not ready for
release, now matter what
> > >> we've announced".
> > >
> > > whatever you do, don't tell them what you really think of XP..
> > >
> > > Geo.
> >
> > This is not a troll.  A serious question.
> >
> > How does XP differ from W2K Pro?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4