| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Proprietary Linux code? |
From: Jeff Shultz There is nothing wrong with writing anything proprietary for Linux. Interestingly, the first UltraSparc I played with was a Fujitsu. I think. It wasn't a Sun box. Geo. wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29007.html > > [...] > > Building big iron is relatively easy for Fujitsu, and Intel knows how to > make chips to plug into servers. A lot of the effort these two will be > putting into the future machines is making Linux scale. SGI, which > announced a 64-way Linux supercomputer a few weeks ago, put a lot of work > into extending Linux and making it work efficiently on its shared memory, > parallel machines. While Red Hat Linux will run out of the box on the > 64-way SGI Altix 3000 machines, if you want it to run really well, you > have to buy all the rejiggered Linux code that SGI has created and which > is not being put back into the open source community by SGI. It is hard > to believe that Fujitsu and Intel, having done work that differentiates > the Fujitsu and Siemens platforms running Linux, are going to put that > work back into the Linux community. Dracott says that while no decisions > about IP have been made, a model that is similar to SGI's way of doing > things is likely. Moreover, it is hard to imagine that IBM, HP, or Dell, > if it ever delivers a 32-way or larger server, will behave much > differently. > > [...] -- Jeff Shultz I don't speak for anyone, and only One speaks for me. --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-4* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/1.45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.