MCP wrote:
> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1433683,00.html
>
>             Fathers winning battle to have custody hearings in public

Yes!!  God bless you F4J.

>             By Frances Gibb
>             Judges are ready to end secrecy to prove that there is no
bias

And they think that's what they'll prove?  Ha!  Angry Harry and the
like will have a field day with this.  If you think you were criticized
before, Heir Judges, wait until you read the commentary on your cases.


>             THE secrecy of the family courts system would be stripped
away
> under radical reforms being drawn up by senior judges which would
open
> hearings to the public.

It's about damned time.  Secret trials are for police states.

Wait, no wonder feminists are so fond of them.

[...]

>             But if the courts are open, then reporting restrictions
are
> likely to remain - unless a judge agrees to lift them - because of
the need
> to protect children's anonymity.

Uh oh.  They're bringing up "the children," which are two words
feminists can use to get almost anything they want.  This is how
they'll stop it, if they stop it.

[...]
---
þ RIMEGate(tm)/RGXPost V1.14 at BBSWORLD * Info{at}bbsworld.com

---
 * RIMEGate(tm)V10.2áÿ* RelayNet(tm) NNTP Gateway * MoonDog BBS
 * RgateImp.MoonDog.BBS at 1/14/05 8:30:13 PM