From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_041D_01C69B97.87537B40
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   More mike miller spin.  If Microsoft has released public information =
on some subject, why would you expect me after I have made clear that =
unlike you I would not release non-public information to make any =
statement that includes information not in the public information to =
which you refer?  If you want a contradictory statements you should =
continue with what you do now which is lie or make up some bullshit and =
claim it as the truth.

Rich

  "/m"  wrote in message =
news:6eh8a2drgn8dmi2tv2isc093691d8l4339{at}4ax.com...
  > I stated clearly on multiple occasions

  It was the things you refused to comment upon that were most
  interesting.  Also interesting is how you hide behind "not post
  non-public information" when the information inconveniently would be =
in
  contradiction to what Microsoft says.=20

  It's a nice little weasel-door you've left for yourself.

    :)

   /m


  On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:00:22 -0700, "Rich"  wrote:

  >   More mike miller spin and propaganda.  I implied nothing.  I =
stated clearly on multiple occasions that I do not post non-public =
information.  I don't post the private and personal information of my =
friends and family either.  I don't see you posting your personal =
information either.  You will remove even IP addresses and domain names. =
 I guess what you say here is limited too.  Go on, spin some more.
  >
  >Rich
  >
  >  "/m"  wrote in message =
news:q6t5a2tispms84dliv1kt9j9qcno04e3bh{at}4ax.com...
  >
  >  Rich Shupak has implied that what he says here is limited due to =
where
  >  he works.  Do you think other Microsoft employees feel differently?
  >
  >   /m
------=_NextPart_000_041D_01C69B97.87537B40
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   More mike miller =
spin.  If=20
Microsoft has released public information on some subject, why would you = expect=20
me after I have made clear that unlike you I would not release = non-public=20
information to make any statement that includes information not in the = public=20
information to which you refer?  If you want a contradictory =
statements you=20
should continue with what you do now which is lie or make up some = bullshit and=20
claim it as the truth.
 
Rich
 

  "/m" <mike{at}barkto.com>">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>
wrote=20
  in message news:6eh8a2drgn8=
dmi2tv2isc093691d8l4339{at}4ax.com...>=20
  I stated clearly on multiple occasionsIt was the things you =
refused to=20
  comment upon that were mostinteresting.  Also interesting is =
how you=20
  hide behind "not postnon-public information" when the
information=20
  inconveniently would be incontradiction to what Microsoft says.=20
  It's a nice little weasel-door you've left for =
yourself. =20
  :) /mOn Thu,
29 Jun 2006 01:00:22 -0700, =
"Rich"=20
  <{at}> wrote:>  
More mike miller spin and=20
  propaganda.  I implied nothing.  I stated clearly on =
multiple=20
  occasions that I do not post non-public information.  I don't =
post the=20
  private and personal information of my friends and family =
either.  I=20
  don't see you posting your personal information either.  You will =
remove=20
  even IP addresses and domain names.  I guess what you say here is =
limited=20
  too.  Go on, spin some =
more.>>Rich>> =20
  "/m" <mike{at}barkto.com>">mailto:mike{at}barkto.com">mike{at}barkto.com>
=
wrote in=20
  message news:q6t5a2tispm=
s84dliv1kt9j9qcno04e3bh{at}4ax.com...>> =20
  Rich Shupak has implied that what he says here is limited due to=20
  where>  he works.  Do you think other
Microsoft =
employees=20
  feel differently?>>   =
/m

------=_NextPart_000_041D_01C69B97.87537B40--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5