| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Long `unzip` time |
BJ> Now one thing your are forgetting, is that a sysop could help a new BJ> user when they first start using the BBS. MK> I am not forgetting. What you seem to be overlooking MK> is that not many people out there are using terminal MK> programs anymore. I think BBS's might require a MK> different approach to take advantage of browsers and the such. And here we are straying from what I would define as a BBS.... Yes, I agree different approaches (browser based, etc.) are needed to get to the users, but that is not a "BBS" to me.... And while I agre that adding a web interface to access what is accessable from Max (message and file base) would be nice, I do not see it as part of Max.... Instead the web access should be served up (by an application running) on a normal (Apache?) web server...... BJ> I am sure there are many BJ> users that were not familiar with a given BBS interface when they BJ> first called one (or more) BBS(es). This is where BJ> it was usefull for BJ> the Sysop to see what was going on with his system..... MK> Better to see what the user is seeing. Hence my MK> running a local networked point using the same MK> programs, more or less, as any other point remotely MK> would use. This way I see it from their perspective. MK> I would like the BBS to be the same. Then I'd know. :-) I think we will agree to disagree.... The sysop console is there so the sysop *can* see exactly what the user is seeing.... Someone comming in as a fidonet point is not a BBS user.... Someone comming in via a web site is not a BBS user. Yes, these are potentially alternate methods of accessing fidonet's information. Max currently does work in conjustion with other tools (via using squish) for allowing fidonet points to access stuff. And some folks have integerated web based interfaces to BBS packages..... While Max (or a program written to interact with Max) may eventually be written, that isn't going to be the initial push. At least from my view point. Yes, I may be wrong on where this project will head in the short term..... It would be easier (in my opinion) to write a piece of code to interface a web server (apache) with the bbs database (echo areas and file areas) than to modify max to also become a web server.... Take care..... Bob Jones, 1:343/41 --- Maximus/2 3.01* Origin: Top Hat 2 BBS (1:343/41) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 343/41 10/345 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.