From: Adam <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the field.near
the bridge">

Rich wrote:
>    Don't lie.  You understood the meaning of the English word.  Are you
> so insecure that this is the only way you have to feel better about
> yourself?
>

Don't you lie. You understood both the meaning of the word & it's real
meaning in this useage.

Why are you seeking to divert & obscure in the exact same way as the
original blogger?

Because yet another major Vista feature ain't going to be a Vista feature?

Adam

> Rich
>
>
>     "Adam" <""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
>     
field.near the bridge">
>     wrote in message news:44a98591$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>     Rich wrote:
>     >    Obscure to whom?  Even you understood it?
>     >
>
>
>     I understand that the aim of the language is to obscure.
>
>     Make up a word (or even a series of words), say it with authority &
>     people will nod sagely & pretend to understand. It's a very old trick.
>     It used to be referred to as pompo-verbosity
>
>     Adam
>
>     > Rich
>     >
>     >
>     >     "Adam"
<""4thwormcastfromthemolehill\"{at}the
>     
>     >    
 field.near the
bridge">
>     >     wrote in message news:44a641eb{at}w3.nls.net...
>     >     Rich wrote:
>     >     >    I commented only on the incorrect and silly
assertion that a
>     >     > discussion of productizing technology is double speak.
>     >     >
>     >
>     >     It is language designed to obscure.
>     >
>     >     It's to give people the feeling as they walk away that
>     something is
>     >     happening to WinFS & that they understand what that thing is
>     where the
>     >     truth is no where near that.
>     >
>     >     Adam

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5