> Hello Kevin!
 > 
 > On 07 Oct 95, Kevin Kline wrote to Rich Lockyer:
 > 
 >  KK>      I've heard of folks using glass before but I've never tried it.
 >  KK> started long before CA so I developed my bad habits early on.
 > 
 > Not that the old methods are bad habits or anything... many fine models
 > are made using the old 'stick the pins in the board' method, probably
 > more models than are made on glass.  What I really like about using glass
 > is that it saves the plans... no holes, no cuts, no glue drops.
 > When possible, I'll run copies of my plans at Kinko's on their large
 > copier and build from the copies... I hate destroying plans.
 > Like I said, I've only tried building on glass a couple of times, but
 > I did like it.
 > 
 >  KK> Until recently I was career military and frequent moving of a
 >  KK> chunck of glass like that could prove to be a problem.
 > 
 > Most definitely.
 > 
 >  KK> I'm just too comfortable doing things the way I do and isn't that
 >  KK> the most important part?
 > 
 > Building methods change over time.
 > Some things we find that we can't, or don't want to live without.
 > I'm sure you've found CA to be better than hide glue or aliphatic
 > resin.  In the '40s and '50s, we didn't have the advantage of Monocote.
 > Models don't look any better today than they did back then, but today,
 > you can turn out a beautiful and well-built bird in a few evenings,
 > where it would have taken weeks using the old methods, no matter
 > how comfortable you were/are with them.
     Nope, I still prefer aliphatic and epoxy.  I do use CA but only for 
certain applications.  A problem I noted with CA is that the joint will not 
flex.  This can be a real problem in gliders with long skinny wings.  I tend
to shy away from "MoneyKote" too.  I use it strickly for my everyday knock 
around models or if weight is really critical.  The rest of the time I like 
the iron fabrics and I paint with DOPE of all things.  Now and then I'll 
even cover a model in silk.  I guess I'm more old fashioned than my age 
tells.  But I really like the old, pre 1920, airplanes and I like to use the
original prescribed methods.  Right now I'm trying like heck to get the 
Smithsonian to commision me to restore an airplane they have in storage.  
they have an original Nieuport 28 still in the crate.  Zero hours on it.  
I've told them I'd retore it for them for 500k plus materials and expenses, 
a place to do it, and 10 years to do it.  I figure if everything goes right 
I could do it in five or less.  Shoot, if they give a guy 250k to build a 
MODEL Aircraft carrier over ten years, the 28 should be worth what I want.  
Maybe Ed will want to come down and help, then build another scale Nieuport 
along with the real one.  Talk of documentation!  Wow!
 > 
 > Other things are simply alternative methods that work better for some
 > people while provide little benefit to others.  This is where the
 > choice of a building surface fits.  Other things in this category
 > might be a #11 X-acto vs. a single-edged razor blade, electric starter
 > vs. a chicken stick, etc...
 > 
 > 
 > C-ya! Rich
 > 
 > --- GoldED 2.40
 >                                                     
---
 * QReader 1.10 * UNREGISTERED EVALUATION VERSION
---
---------------