From: "Rich" 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0480_01C69C2C.C8C07CF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   Actually I used Windows Live Search.  I posted a google URL here only =
because several of the people here are immature enough to assert such =
results are biased in some way.

Rich

  "John Beamish"  wrote in message =
news:op.tbyk8huom6tn4t{at}dellblack.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com...
  Google also has indexes pointing to pages denying the holocaust so the =
=20
  existence of a reference in Google is far from definitive.

  Interesting that you chose Google search instead of Microsoft's =
search.

  On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:14:14 -0400, Rich  wrote:

  >    How you failed so badly to find usage of this I can't even guess. =
 =20
  > Try http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3Dproductize.
  >
  > Rich
  >
  >   "Robert G Lewis"  wrote in
message =20
  > news:44a460ad{at}w3.nls.net...
  >   Ever try looking it up in a dictionary ? The only place I found =20
  > definitions for it were two MS sites.
  >     "Rich"  wrote in message news:44a45e10$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  >        It is used in English speech and writing.
  >
  >     Rich
  >
  >       "Adam"  wrote in
message =20
  > news:44a3c80c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
  >       Rich wrote:
  >       >    Commercializing and productizing are not the same.  The =20
  > English
  >       > language has lots of words with similar or overlapping but =20
  > distinct
  >       > meanings.
  >       >
  >
  >       "Productize" is an English word?
  >
  >       So if I feed food to a pig I am "pigizing the food"?
If I turn =
some
  >       parts into a train I am "trainizing the parts"?
  >
  >       Good grief.
  >
  >       Adam

------=_NextPart_000_0480_01C69C2C.C8C07CF0
Content-Type: text/html;
        charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








   Actually
I used Windows =
Live=20
Search.  I posted a google URL here only because several of the =
people here=20
are immature enough to assert such results are biased in some =
way.
 
Rich
 

  "John Beamish" <JLBeamish{at}rogers.com>">mailto:JLBeamish{at}rogers.com">JLBeamish{at}rogers.com>
=
wrote in=20
  message news:op.tbyk8huom6tn4t{at}dellblack.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com..=
.Google=20
  also has indexes pointing to pages denying the holocaust so the =20
  existence of a reference in Google is far from=20
  definitive.Interesting that you chose Google search
instead of =

  Microsoft's search.On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:14:14 -0400, =
Rich =20
  wrote:>    How you
failed so badly to find =
usage of=20
  this I can't even guess.   > Try http://w" target="new">http://w=">http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3Dproductize">http://w=
ww.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3Dproductize.>>=20
  Rich>>   "Robert
G Lewis" <r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>">mailto:r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net">r.g.lewis{at}comcast.net>
=
wrote in=20
  message  > news:44a460ad{at}w3.nls.net...>=
  =20
  Ever try looking it up in a dictionary ? The only place I found  =
>=20
  definitions for it were two MS
sites.>     =
"Rich"=20
  <{at}> wrote in message news:44a45e10$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>       =20
  It is used in English speech and=20
 
writing.>>    =20
 
Rich>>      
"Adam" <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moesmailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes">mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes
A>>=20
  wrote in message  > news:44a3c80c$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
>      =20
  Rich
wrote:>      
=
>   =20
  Commercializing and productizing are not the same.  The  =
>=20
 
English>      
> language has =
lots of=20
  words with similar or overlapping but  >=20
 
distinct>      
>=20
 
meanings.>      =20
 
>>>      
"Productize" =
is an=20
  English
word?>>      
So =
if I feed=20
  food to a pig I am "pigizing the food"? If I turn=20
 
some>      
parts into a train I =
am=20
  "trainizing the =
parts"?>>      =20
  Good
grief.>>      =20
Adam

------=_NextPart_000_0480_01C69C2C.C8C07CF0--

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5