> 
-> ~> Interesting! Thanks!
-> 
-> Interesting, but factually inaccurate.  He was blindly repeating Klahn's
-> position, long after it was shown to be wrong.  You should be highly
-> offended at Ackley for doing that.  That is YOUR role!
->  
:-) Dang! I keep forgetting my lines.

Two sides of events I know nothing about. If Ackley is 'blindly repeating'
it will be a first. I don't believe he has an agenda. You,on the other
hand,   
are not exactly in your posts a Klahn fan :-) ...(And yes I am biased
toward
friends...)
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5