bluesmama wrote:
> greg1199{at}yahoo.com wrote:
> > bluesmama wrote:
[...]

> > That snipe at the end tells us what you're really all about.  How
can
> > you expect us to open up to you when you have given away what you
> are?
> > You're a hater of men, so you'll not get any decent answer from me.
> > Soak your head, you high-heeled jackboot.
>
> Well I do hate to say it, but your argument does have merit.

Yes it does, and I'm not interested in what you like or dislike saying.

> In my defence, I said what I did after reading many posts to this
> newsgroup about how greedy, materialistic, dishonest, etc., etc.
women
> were, and frankly, was disgusted and frustrated.

Did someone ask you how you "feeyul" about what we post here?
Obviously not, so piss off with your "disgusted and frustrated."  As
the radio has a dial, so does the computer have a mouse, so pick a
group that gives you a warm fuzzy if you don't like what's here.

> So I asked a question to which I _did_ want an answer, because I was

I hate.  I said.  I feel.  I want.  I did.  I I I I I.  Here's an idea,
Big Bird.  Put down that emotional baggage (with a jib hoist) and think
about someone else for a change.

> truly confused as to whether there was any good feeling towards women

Confused my ass.  Of course you'd never guess this, but you're not the
first battle-hardened broad to have the bright idea of coming here and
handing out insults wrapped as questions.  You may as well ask us,
"When did you stop beating your wife?"  Here's another free clue: We've
seen this a million times, and you're hardly the best.
[...]

> the "vicious" snipe slipped out.

Indeed it did.  I'm sure you're "disgusted and frustrated" at your
pathetic inability to hide your hatred of men, as you let it "slip out"
now and then.  Perhaps NOW has a seminar on how to make your writing
even more weak and hazy, so that it has a generally insulting tone, yet
can't really be taken to mean anything.  They're experts at it.  You
can't write worth a damn.

> So. To those men in the newsgroup who _do_ love women as persons, I

OOPS.  You let another snipe slip out.  In this, you intone that a
substantial portion of us don't love women "as persons."  Hence, you
wrap an insult as a question.  You'll never learn.  You're a stereotype
as typical and predictable as Haley's Comet, the latest in a line that
stretches back, oh, maybe 10 years.  Save this dumbshit for the AOL
teen discussion group on grrl power.  (I'm assuming there is one.)

> apologize for my statement. To those of you who choose to see women
as
> less honest, loving and worthy of respect than men, you can go soak
> your heads.

I've a better idea.  I'll go .... continue being right.  You can
continue being a hyperemotional basket case.


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/17/05 1:12:15 AM ---