Thanks for putting Andrew straight, be fascinating to see if he actually
admits his error |-)

PE> Actually, if Rod wasn't such a stick-in-the-mud SOT/EOT would rapidly
PE> take off, because he would be generating them with PQWK!  Hey Rod, if
PE> I modify PQWK202 to add in the *ONE* change (I'll show you the source
PE> code) to generate SOT/EOT, will you switch to that?  I'll call it
PE> PQWK202B.

No way, thats even worse, splitting the development stream |-)

More seriously, nope, the original code is such an abortion that I have
no confidence that its clear what its doing. And even if I was confident,
on something which matters, I STILL wont do anything except proper testing.

On this point system in total, I have actually now seen atleast 5 actual
faults, bugs, warts, blemishes etc, most of which just silently delete
mail without the slightest warning or any complaint at all.

That one a couple of days ago will likely make me get off my arse and
do a proper standalone message counter for PKTs atleast relatively soon
tho. Mainly coz even with the current versions of code I am using, there
are now about 4 know silent mail deleters which become visible with some
unusual occurrence.

--- PQWK202