| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | pqwk testing |
PE> I'm not saying 2.22 is perfect, just that it is a far better PE> alternative than 2.21, and that there is no valid reason to PE> be sticking to 2.21. RS> Pity you were ALSO saying *I* should change TOO. I aint gunna RS> till I test it more carefully. PE> All that I have been saying in this thread and the other one PE> was why Frank should upgrade, not you. Bullshit Paul. You EXPLICITLY said I should upgrade. You cant fake that away, I STILL have that message boy |-) PE> You seem to be furiously backpedalling on that one, saying that PE> I was saying you should upgrade. Pity you did. PE> Since I don't care if you upgrade, Thats not what you said previously, tho you have NOW been saying that. PE> because you're not sending dud netmail to me, I would like to see PE> you try and quote such a message (in these current threads, ie in PE> the last month). How about this then boy ? =========================================================================== Date: 12-29-94 (01:04) From: Paul Edwards To: Dieter Mirbach Subj: abortion incorporated --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ... various deletions P.S. to Keith - looking back in the old PUBLIC_DOMAIN messages, you were the first person to complain about PVERT not working. What were you using it for? P.P.S. to Rod - so is Christmas a good time to do your own testing on PQWK so that you can be happy that it is operating properly and then switch to it? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can blush now |-) --- PQWK202* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 690/718 711/809 934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.