On Mar 3, 6:37=A0pm, "Michael J. Mahon"  wrote:

> > Regarding an enhanced IIGS -- let's call it a IIEGS to save typing --
> > I have no illusions that such a thing would have any appeal except
> > perhaps to a few dozen hardcore Apple enthusiasts and hardware
> > experimenters. =A0I know there are a few people like this out there as =
I
> > have visited their web sites and seen their postings here.
>
> I agree that there are interested folks, but I submit that most of
> them are intrigued by the prospect of using modern technology to
> reproduce the Apple II (in its several versions), with or without
> enhancements. =A0Relatively few of them are programmers just waiting
> for an "enhanced" Apple II to write new suites of programs for it.

One only has to look at how under utilised the existing enhancements
are. For example, a IIe with a 4Mhz accelerator, 1mb of extended
memory and a fixed disk drive is a *vastly* more capable piece of
hardware than the standard 128k + Disk ][ configuration. Appleworks
and PublishIt! exploit that platform nicely, but that's about it.
Where is the large suite of software the programmers have had 20 years
to write? :-)

Matt
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32