Hi Bo,

 PK> The following is a rather verbose message I sent to 
 PK> Scott outlining what happened here and in reply he 
 PK> confirmed my finding's, however I can't find his 
 PK> reply.....;-( I thought he said that future code should 
 PK> remove this issue but maybe it never got into the 
 PK> source you are using. Anyway, the following might be of 
 PK> use to you...

 BS> We might be able to correct for it. Just adding a extra 
 BS> configuration parameter or? What would you propose.

If I remember correctly, Scott was a little worried about one aspect of the
QWK environment that _MIGHT_ allow a QWK user to do "bad things"
to the BBS, the end result was part of the reason for the hard coded menu
name. I really wish I still had his reply, it was quite involved...

As for proposing something, well I don't know, I guess it depends on how
configurable the system is in that area and what dangers may exist for
external data (IE a QWK packet) to modify the way the BBS worked.

Cheers.............pk.


--- Maximus/2 3.01