From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0374_01C6DD83.E449BD90
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What possible meaning of the word "rearranging" could mean this?
Rich
"Glenn Meadows" wrote in message =
news:4512ed82$1{at}w3.nls.net...
I took his "rearranging" to mean changing the file with time limited =
DRM=20
code, not time shifting.
--=20
Glenn M.
"Rich" wrote in message news:4512e62c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
No. This is about the following statements from adam
I wonder if it changes the file in any way. If
so.....ummm....copyright....? If I own the file then like a movie or
piece of music "rearranging without permission" etc is verboten.
The rearranging to which he is referring is what you call format =
shifting.
Rich
"Geo" wrote in message =
news:45126772$2{at}w3.nls.net...
what about format shifting to your ipod then sharing the files? =
That's=20
what this is about yes?
Geo.
"Rich" wrote in message news:4510efb3{at}w3.nls.net...
I have always thought it OK rip your own CDs for your own use. =
I=20
have also thought it OK to further format shift into other formats =
including=20
transfering to your ipod or other music player for your own use. I'm =
pretty=20
sure you have asserted this position as well in the past. Only now do =
you=20
act like an idiot with some silly position that it is illegal for =
apple to=20
support format shifting in itunes if they try to make money on ipods =
and=20
itunes. Why haven't you been more vocal about your silly position for =
the=20
past few years?
Rich
"Adam" wrote in message=20
news:4510e6c8{at}w3.nls.net...
Rich wrote:
> What an idiot. You think I believe ripping is OK only =
because my
> employer thinks it is OK? What a hoot!
Nope I think your views change as those of your employer change.
> And your sudden assertion that
> ripping is not OK is because of what?
>
I never said it was right to rip in order to make money. Home
backup/format shifting by the person who has purchased the media =
etc=20
is
fine but to make money makes you into a publisher. You are the =
one who
holds it's fine for people to rip so long as it makes your =
employer=20
money.
Adam
> Rich
>
>
> "Adam" > wrote in message
> news:45100d5a{at}w3.nls.net...
> Rich wrote:
> > Apparently you. My views haven't changed. You =
appear to=20
take
> silly
> > positions at the drop of a hat.
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> > "Adam"
> > > wrote in =
message
> > news:450fecc9$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > Rich wrote:
> > > My views haven't changed. I think it is OK =
to rip=20
your own
> > CDs for
> > > your own use. Always have. You are changing =
your=20
tune and
> > looking like
> > > a fool with your new very silly assertions.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > So Rich who is the fool/has his views dictated to =
him by=20
his
> betters?
> >
> > Adam
> Nope, You simply take whatever position your employer =
takes,=20
which
> is in
> itself dictated by the search from profits.
>
> Adam=20
------=_NextPart_000_0374_01C6DD83.E449BD90
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What
possible meaning of =
the word=20
"rearranging" could mean this?
Rich
"Glenn Meadows" <gmeadow{at}comcast.net>">mailto:gmeadow{at}comcast.net">gmeadow{at}comcast.net>
wrote =
in message=20
news:4512ed82$1{at}w3.nls.net...I=20
took his "rearranging" to mean changing the file with time limited DRM =
code, not time shifting.--
Glenn M."Rich" =
<{at}>=20
wrote in message news:4512e62c$1{at}w3.nls.net...=
=20
No. This is about the following statements from =
adam I=20
wonder if it changes the file in any way. If =20
so.....ummm....copyright....? If I own the file then like a movie =
or =20
piece of music "rearranging without permission" etc is =
verboten.The=20
rearranging to which he is referring is what you call format=20
shifting.Rich
"Geo" <georger{at}nls.net>">mailto:georger{at}nls.net">georger{at}nls.net>
wrote in =
message news:45126772$2{at}w3.nls.net...=
=20
what about format shifting to your ipod then sharing the files? That's =
what this is about yes?
Geo. =
"Rich"=20
<{at}> wrote in message news:4510efb3{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
I have always thought it OK rip your own CDs for your own use. I =
have also thought it OK to further format shift into other formats =
including transfering to your ipod or other music player for your =
own=20
use. I'm pretty sure you have asserted this position as well =
in the=20
past. Only now do you act like an idiot with some silly =
position=20
that it is illegal for apple to support format shifting in itunes =
if they=20
try to make money on ipods and itunes. Why haven't you been =
more=20
vocal about your silly position for the past few=20
years? =
Rich =20
"Adam" <mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moesmailto:mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes">mmmmm_beer_mmmm_donuts{at}moes
A>>=20
wrote in message news:4510e6c8{at}w3.nls.net...&nbs=
p; =20
Rich wrote:
> =
What an=20
idiot. You think I believe ripping is OK only because=20
my >
employer thinks it is =
OK? What=20
a
hoot!
Nope I think your views =
change=20
as those of your employer =
change.
>=20
And your sudden assertion
that > =
ripping=20
is not OK is because of
what? =20
>
I never said it was right =
to rip in=20
order to make money.
Home =
backup/format=20
shifting by the person who has purchased the media etc=20
is
fine but to make money makes =
you into=20
a publisher. You are the one
who =
holds it's=20
fine for people to rip so long as it makes your employer=20
money. =20
Adam
>=20
Rich =
> =20
>
> =
"Adam"=20
< * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267 270
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267
|