Andre Lieven wrote:
> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> > I don't make the mistake - or have the necessary arrogance - to
think
> > I'm an authority on anything other than myself.
>
> Not even on that trivial item...

I believe everyone has a valuable perspective to add. You don't. Your
loss.

> > Maybe if I was a man,
>
> Maybe if you were an *honest and honourable* woman.

You wouldn't recognize one.

> But then, you couldn't be a sexist bigoted misandrist Festering
> Femmeroid.

Same old bunch of bull. How very you.

> > I'd talk and think like a man.
>
> Naw, you'd think and talk like a Male Feminist.

> > If you don't want a woman's viewpoint,
>
> Non sequitur. We just are of the considered view that *your
> " women's viewpoint " is, to say the least, myopic.

Might want to look up non sequitur, then you'd be able to use it
correctly. And is that the "royal" we?

As far as the myopia goes, as long as it keeps your diatribes blurry,
I'm all for it.

> > don't read what I post.
>
> Nope. Since you do not understand *freedom of speech* on unmoderated
> newsgroups, I will be generous enough to explain it to you:

Freedom of speech wasn't the issue. If you want to read and reply to
things that irritate you, be my guest.

> Anyone can make any comment to anything that you post, and theres
> not a blessed thing that you can do about it. If it makes you stamp
> your widdle feetsies in shock, too bad. Deal with it, or get off
> your computer, and go back to your remedial kindergarten class.
> 

Enough with the feetsies already. Get a new schtick.

> > Simple enough.
>
> Yes, you are. Thanks for admitting that fact.

We're all simple, Andre. Some of us are just too busy verbally jacking
off to notice it. If you want to keep thinking of yourself as profound,
you just go right ahead and continue to be not only cranky, but deluded
as well.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/23/05 2:33:38 AM ---