Hello, Maurice Kinal.
On 02/11/14 18.30 you wrote:

 MK> Hey Maurice!
 MK>> Nailed it!  :-)
 MK> Yep.  Looks good from this angle even though we both know that the 
 MK> offset isn't correct for our actual location.  However it produces 
 MK> the same datetime once corrected for utc so it wouldn't have 
 MK> mattered.

It might still make a diff on unsupported software that are not knowing both
syntax
 
 MK> maurice@atom [ ~ ]$ date --date="02 Nov 14  12:10:20 -0500" Sun 
 MK> Nov  2 17:10:20 UTC 2014

Note this is still missing in golded and msged, both of them is still based on
how it worked on dos, sadly, olso that i have cougt templates not in utf-8 that
are same as the added chrs kludge, makes it hard to red on recipient software
 
 MK> Note that there is no TZUTC in this reply as the datetime is 
 MK> already utc by default and it makes absolutely no difference if 
 MK> there was a TZUTC since NOBODY gets it right anyhow.  A total 
 MK> waste of bytes not unlike CHRS for utf-8.  ;-)

Yes we could waste qp as well :)

Is there an ebuild for bashing fidonet with vi, vi could edit ebuilds imho with
nice highlights :)
 
 MK> ... Don't cry for me I have vi.

Wish that nano was as hard as vi, bah

--
Best regards!
Posted using Hotdoged on Android
--- Hotdoged/2.10/Android