++> Inspired by Frank Masingill Ideology
 ++> vs. Philosophy "opinions" ......
 
   I would go out on a limb, knowing you will correct at least
   my technical errors. Having monitored your many efforts into
   standing between "Philosophy" and "Ideology", some lights seem
   still dim ........yes?
 
   We live by, and within, ideologies, most formed to some degree
   by initial philosophical leanings.      Whether individual, or
   collective (such as government), these idea based institutions
   are how we do our daily business.     The family itself is the
   prime ideology of our species. When ideology breaks down we have
   chaos.
 
 FM> I know that some of you who actually listen and meditate were
 FM> somewhat puzzled a while back when, following Eric Voegelin,
 FM> I stressed the sharp difference between ideology, which is
 FM> always to be deplored, and philosophy, a noble pursuit.  There
 FM> were honest responses (some dishonest ones as well, of course)
 FM> characterizing "ideology" as nothing more than the holding of a
 FM> body of opinions and therefore harmless.
 
     "Dishonest" to differ in opinion ??? ....AND Frank, we both
      know that *nothing* is harmless; even "noble philosophy"
      can be tossed about (or is that "so called" philosophy?) !!!
 
 FM> Lo and behold, from an unexpected quarter (grin), SOCIOLOGY,
 FM> I perceive some vindication! I ran across this little book in
 FM> a series called "Explorations in Interpretative Sociology."
 FM> It is by one Lewis S. Feuer who was at the time of publication,
 FM> 1975, a Professor of Sociology at the University of Toronto.
 FM> The title is _Ideology and the Ideologists_. Generally, I always
 FM> had the impression that Voegelin had little regard for much of the
 FM> modern field of sociology, probably due to the fact that his
 FM> favorite target for the center of modern ideology was Auguste
 FM> Comte, usually acknowledged as the father of sociology and also
 FM> of positivism.  I looked in vain for a reference to Voegelin in
 FM> this little book and thus far have found none - certainly not in
 FM> the index.  Yet, at the same time, it is as clear a statement
 FM> describing and deploring Ideology as even Voegelin would, I think,
 FM> have had to endorse had he ever seen it and it is difficult to think
 FM> he did not although that is certainly possible.
 
     You are not in any meaningful way vindicated by finding a source
     that helps YOU make your own ideological opinion more fixed. You
     yourself have NOT YET clarified your distinction beyond your
     own opinion .......and you dabble a bit in ideologies yourself.
 
 FM> It's only 220 pages long including the index and I commend it
 FM> for your perusal if you are interested in the subject.  Naturally,
 FM> I'm in general agreement with the validity of the phenomenon and
 FM> its opposition to philosophy.
 
 FM> Voegelin has said that "ideology is rebellion against God and
 FM> Man" and Professor Feuer is saying almost the same thing.
 
  Saying it twice does not a case maketh..........
  My being probably less mentally swift than the average bear,
  Voegelin's statement does not ring me sensible, as "GOD" *is*
  a package of ideologies unto Himself and "MAN" ever lives within
  "ideologies", some good, some bad; just as some philosophies are
  good, and some bad. Also (as said) since ideologies employ
  philosophies, and philosophies often wear ideological underpants
  (can't see them), stancing them against one another seems counter
  rational.
 
  If there is some convoluted logic that makes my response too
  simple or incorrect (or my definitions bent), I would defer,
  but so far, *your own words* have not yet made such a case
  clear .......or persuasive.
 
  Sincerely, (I hope not dishonest ?)
 
                                     David ... oo
--- Maximus/2 3.01
---------------