From: "RobertB." 

In article
,
 "John Beamish"  wrote:

> Nah, stick with paper.  You can get "fiddled" results
instantly.  Or you
> can get a fully verifiable set of results in an hour or two of manual
> counting.
>
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 08:45:49 -0400, /m  wrote:
>
> >
> > I want an electronic voting system that goes through at least the same
> > level of testing, security, and auditing that the electronic gambling
> > systems go through.
> >
> > There's an irony in there somewhere....
> >
> >  /m

I like the paper ballots idea too. You can have election monitors from all
the parties present to ensure that no ballot stuffing occurs.

By the way, Ars Technica is making the PDF available for free now.

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5