On 2018 Jul 05 06:46:42, you wrote to Victor Sudakov:
VS>> has always seemed technically unfounded (or at least the
VS>> unarticulated "any other method" statement) to me. Does it mean that
VS>> I can use the INA:fido.sibptus.ru flag all right, but cannot use the
VS>> INA:node49.net5005.sibptus.ru flag? Why?
BP> it does not work since binkd only handle single root-domain in binkd.cfg
binkd.conf does allow for different lookup domains... simply specify them on
the domain line...
4D eg:
domain fidonet x:\\bink\\outbound 1 binkp.net
domain foobar x:\\bink\\outbound 1 foobar.org
domain deadbeef x:\\bink\\outbound 1 deadbeef.info
5D eg:
domain fidonet x:\\bink\\out\\fidonet 1 binkp.net
domain foobar x:\\bink\\out\\foobar 11 foobar.org
domain deadbeef x:\\bink\\out\\deadbeef 1111 deadbeef.info
the real question is if the FTN othernets provide DNS zone lookups for their
networks that binkp.net provides for fidonet...
BP> try in cfg:
BP> root-domain sibptus.ru
comment that out and never use it again...
)\/(ark
Always Mount a Scratch Monkey
Do you manage your own servers? If you are not running an IDS/IPS yer doin' it
wrong...
... A hot date involving me, you and a dozen habanaros...
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
|