| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Max linux vs windows |
Hello Ryan. 19 Oct 03 19:54, you wrote to All: RL> BTW can someone tell me why when I use the win32 version of Maximus 3.1, RL> doors don't work? I've noticed that it doesn't output the right COM port RL> to the dropfile .. but I've tried hardcoding the proper com port into the RL> doorsys.mec and doors still wouldn't work. That's why I'm using the DOS RL> maximus on windows. It's because Win32 uses a dynamically assigned com port handle as opposed to 16 bit DOS-based OS's, that use a static comm port handle that is linked to the port number. That means that when a Win 32 app tries to pass a hot comm port handle to a DOS app, the comm port handle that the Windows app sends doesn't match what the DOS app expects. There are only two ways around this; either use a virtual modem device which mimics what the DOS apps expect, and run a DOS BBS package which will then pass the port handle properly to a DOS door under this setup, or run the Win32 BBS with a special fossil driver that is called everytime the DOS based door is called, which will then translate the Win comm port handle setting to what the DOS app expects. Programs like COM/IP and Netmodem work in the first example. Programs like SyncFos and NetFoss work in the second. An NT-based system is required for the special fossil drivers to work. --- GoldED/W32 3.0.1* Origin: MikE'S MaDHousE: WelComE To ThE AsYluM! (1:134/11) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 134/11 10 3613/1275 123/500 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.