On 05/04/2010 04:16 AM, John Massey -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 JM> On 5/3/2010 11:40 PM, Ed Hulett -> John Massey wrote:
 RS>>>> Because it's not known if it *IS* an act of terrorism, YET.

 JM>>> I'm sure the people around the car were terrorized.

 EH>> If a car bomb in the mi ddle of thousands of people walking around at
 EH>> Times Square isn't meant to strike terror, what is the purpose?

 EH>> If it had been successful, there would have been hundreds injured and
 EH>> several deaths and well as terrified New Yorkers for weeks and
 JM> months to
 EH>> come.

 EH>> Sauer is hoping upon hope that it was the act of a tea party member.
 EH>> What he is ignoring is that the person of interest is a naturalized
 EH>> Pakistani who had just returned from months in Pakistan.


 JM> I know I'll never get an answer from him, but if it wasn't an attempt at
 JM> terrorizing NYC what was it? Performance Art?

What do you expect from someone who first claimed it could have been a
"prank" perpetrated by teens.

Ed

-- 
"For it is a truth, which the experience of all ages has attested,
that the people
are commonly most in danger when the means of injuring their rights are in the
possession of those [toward] whom they entertain the least suspicion."
--Alexander Hamilton

Blogs: http://edsramblings.wordpress.com | http://woodcaringnsuch.wordpress.com
http://edsscrollsawbits.blogspot.com

Facebook: http://wwwfacebook.com/ed.hulett | Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/yaesu

Linux User #416016
Linux Machine #385030

--- Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9pre) Gecko/20100217 Light