From: "Robert Comer" 

> I want to get away from some MS stuff, but OE 6 seems better at some setup
> things than does thunderbird.

I know what you mean.  I haven't found anything I like better. :(



--
Bob Comer





"Gary Britt"  wrote in message
news:4558bfef$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>
> OK, I finally found the right place to set news messages to be in text
> only, under thunderbird.
>
> I want to get away from some MS stuff, but OE 6 seems better at some setup
> things than does thunderbird.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> Antti Kurenniemi wrote:
>> I can read all your posts just fine as plain text, using OE 6. I always
>> read as plain text (email also), because I'm quite tired of watching out
>> for the latest embedded-in-html exploit trick... plain text is nice.
>>
>>
>> Antti Kurenniemi
>>
>> "Gary Britt"  wrote in message
>> news:4558a97f{at}w3.nls.net...
>>> Thanks John,
>>>
>>> I recently switched to using thunderbird and I did select for default to
>>> newsgroups to be HTML.  That is what I prefer.  It often bugs me to
>>> select whether to send a newsgroup message in html only, html and text,
>>> or text only, but doesn't ask me that question every time.
>>>
>>> Are people not able to read my messages (or some of them anyway) if I
>>> post in html only?  Anyone know how to get rid of the annoying
>>> thunderbird popup asking me if I want to post html only or html and
>>> text, etc. ?  Outlook Express never bugged me with this.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> John Beckett wrote:
>>>> Gary Britt  wrote in message
>>>> news::
>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>> Gary - Ellen has reminded me...
>>>> I don't know if you are aware, but you have selected an option (I
>>>> assume)
>>>> to post in html ONLY. Normally (if you must use html!),
you would use
>>>> an
>>>> option to post plain text AND html.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5