Andre Lieven wrote:
> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> > Andre Lieven wrote:
> >> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> >> > Andre Lieven wrote:
> >> >> "bluesmama" (onebluesmama{at}gmail.com) writes:
> >> >> > I don't make the mistake - or have the
necessary arrogance -
to
> >> >> > think I'm an authority on anything other than myself.
> >> >>
> >> >> Not even on that trivial item...
> >> >
> >> > I believe everyone has a valuable perspective to add. You don't.
> >>
> >> " No one is entitled to their opinion. They are only entitled to
an
> >> *informed* opinion. " Harlan Ellison.
> >>
> >> > Your loss.
> >>
> >> Perfect Festering Femmeroid score continues: 100% wrong.
> >>
> >> >> > Maybe if I was a man,
> >> >>
> >> >> Maybe if you were an *honest and honourable* woman.
> >> >
> >> > You wouldn't recognize one.
> >>
> >> No proof offered ? Claim fails.
> >>
> >> >> But then, you couldn't be a sexist bigoted
misandrist Festering
> >> >> Femmeroid.
> >> >
> >> > Same old bunch of bull. How very you.
> >>
> >> No proof offered ? Claim fails.
> >>
> >> >> > I'd talk and think like a man.
> >> >>
> >> >> Naw, you'd think and talk like a Male Feminist.
> >>
> >> Indeed.
> >>
> >> >> > If you don't want a woman's viewpoint,
> >> >>
> >> >> Non sequitur. We just are of the considered view that *your
> >> >> " women's viewpoint " is, to say the least, myopic.
> >> >
> >> > Might want to look up non sequitur, then you'd be able to use it
> >> > correctly.
> >>
> >> No proof offered ? Claim fails.
> >>
> >> > And is that the "royal" we?
> >>
> >> No.
> >>
> >> > As far as the myopia goes, as long as it keeps your diatribes
> >> > blurry, I'm all for it.
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >> >> > don't read what I post.
> >> >>
> >> >> Nope. Since you do not understand *freedom of speech* on
> >> >> unmoderated
> >> >> newsgroups, I will be generous enough to explain it to you:
> >> >
> >> > Freedom of speech wasn't the issue. If you want to read and
reply
> >> > to things that irritate you, be my guest.
> >>
> >> Indeed. I will do as I choose, and theres AbZero that you can do
> >> about it.
> >>
> >> >> Anyone can make any comment to anything that you post, and
theres
> >> >> not a blessed thing that you can do about it. If it makes you
> >> >> stamp
> >> >> your widdle feetsies in shock, too bad. Deal with it, or get
off
> >> >> your computer, and go back to your remedial
kindergarten class.
> >> >> 
> >> >
> >> > Enough with the feetsies already. Get a new schtick.
> >>
> >> No.
> >>
> >> >> > Simple enough.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes, you are. Thanks for admitting that fact.
> >> >
> >> > We're all simple, Andre.
> >>
> >> No proof offered ? Claim fails.
> >>
> >> > Some of us are just too busy verbally jacking off to notice it.
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >> > If you want to keep thinking of yourself as profound,
> >> > you just go right ahead and continue to be not only cranky, but
> >> > deluded as well.
> >>
> >> No proof offered ? Claim fails.
> >>
> >> Baby Feminists is SO stupid. Narcissistic, too.
> >>
> >> Andre
> >
> > Need a tissue?
>
> Need your first neuron ?
>
> "bluesmama's" INABILITY to debate/discuss/refute ANYTHING I
> wrote, noted.
>
> Andre
>
>
> --
> " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
>                                     The Man Prayer, Red Green.

I'm still waiting for something worth debating with you on this thread.
I think you're an misogynistic, bigoted, arrogant, deluded,
self-obsessed idiot, for the record. You think I'm all sorts of nasty
things.

Listen up, sugar, I KNOW all that. YOU know all that. Get over it
already.

Now if you were to quit proudly pissing your name on the screen and
tell me something about men and women I don't know and that you didn't
read in a book or watch on TV or copy from another similarly
close-minded poster, I'd be happy to reply with something other than
"You're a misogynistic....idiot."

Cheers.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/26/05 2:45:46 AM ---