RT>I couldn't care less what Charles is, and to a great extent he is
  >right, his position is irrelevant to most discussions.  Its when he
  >makes what some perceive as extraordinary claims, particularly in his
  >_interpretations_ of certain laws, his adamant stance on his opinions,
  >and the insulting manner that he confronts those that disagree with him
  >that we begin to require substantiation.  Since most of us are NOT
  >actively involved in law enforcement and have no basis for forming a
  >conclusion, his position in the LE community would go a long way in
  >establishing that credibility.
For not caring, you sure made a big deal of it, Ron.  Now you try to
back out and cover your tail with more b.s.  As for my "adamant stance" 
on my opinions, that is my right.  You can overcome those opinions by
doing the research or asking someone else on the conference if they 
agree with me.  As for your claim that I confront those that disagree
with me in an insulting manner that is only true when people like you
commence an assault on me by demanding to know things that you are not
entitled to know and which the moderator in that conference already 
decided you were not entitled to know.  Establishing credibility is
not your concern Ron, unless you are trying to estalish YOURS.  What I
post is read by many law enforcement officers who, after reading what
I post make their own QUALIFIED judgments as to my creditbility.  
Again, I really don't want to post to or about you and I would 
appreciate it if you would honor that and ALSO not post about me in 
your usual manner of starting trouble.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * "Windws is ine for bckgroun comunicaions" - Bll Gats, 192
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------