On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 1:23:25 PM UTC-4, Harry Potter wrote:
> On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 1:29:39 PM UTC-4, Anssi Saari wrote:
> > Other than that, maybe LZMA or LZSS might be interesting? I believe LZSS
> > has been implemented on 65xx and Z80 processors, at least the
> > uncompressing part.
>
> I just looked at LZSS, and I seem to be using a variant of it for my 16-bit
technique.  Thank you for pointing it out, though!  :)

I thank you for mentioning LZSS.  It's *better* than LZW, *and* it's faster!. 
:D  Let me tweak it some more.  I'm good at tweaking.  :)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05