TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: osdebate
to: All
from: mike
date: 2007-06-03 08:44:12
subject: Why Microsoft`s innovation is only Surface deep

From: mike 


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/01/fentem_microsoft_surface/

===
Comment [ Microsoft calls its multitouch user interface Surface Computing
"a new paradigm". We asked a British pioneer in the field to
examine the claim. - ed.]


This week Microsoft demonstrated a 'multi-touch' coffee table user
interface it calls Surface Computing, and it got the BBC - and some
Register readers - very excited.

"The amount of time they spent working on this suggests they didn't
just nick it off someone else in the last 18 months", writes Dan.
"Give credit to Microsoft for being first to a commercial
market," agrees Amy Wohl.

But let's set the record straight.

Microsoft's Surface Computing isn't "a new paradigm", nor is it
adding any innovation to an existing paradigm. Table computing isn't a new
market, either, and Microsoft's demos are years away from being
productized.

In fact, according to Bill Buxton - ironically a Principal Researcher at
Microsoft's own research centre - these kinds of multi-touch interfaces
have been around for over twenty years. Perhaps the Surface Computing
marketing guys at Microsoft should check out Bill's web site.

Moreover, perhaps Microsoft and developers like Jeff Han at NYU, who are
building these 'old-school' multi-touch interfaces out of cameras and
projectors, should consider the fatal flaw in their 'innovations'. This
being that all back-projection interfaces are enormous. Think about it -
you've essentially got a small cinema in a box behind a screen. Forget
mobility and portability. Is it even moveable?

Another major concern about this pioneering work, was pointed out by Reg
commenter Nick Ryan.

"Notice something about all the examples? It's only used in the dark,
which is nice considering that on average it's dark only 50 per cent of the
time!"

The systems developed by Microsoft and Han do indeed look pretty on
YouTube, but more pragmatic developers have known for some years that a
successful commercial product would have to be flat and portable. People
just don't want huge cabinets in the era of mobile computing and
flat-screen TV's.

I've developed several multi-touch interfaces, and I know the problems and
challenges.

While Microsoft and Han appear to have been resurrecting ergonomics
exercises from the past, other major players, such as Apple, Philips and
Toshiba have been thinking hard about how to do multi-touch sensing without
resorting to using a camera and a projector.

Apple acquired the multi-touch know-how that is going into their imminent
iPhone product from the company Fingerworks , while some interesting
developments have come from Toshiba Matsushita who have created a very
clever multi-touch LCD display using negligible additional hardware.

Potentially even more exciting is a British company Plastic Logic who seem
to have created a flexible pressure-sensitive multi-touch interactive
display, surely the Holy Grail of commercial touchscreen technologies. Just
last week Plastic Logic laid the foundation stone of its e-paper
fabrication plant in Dresden, expected to be operational in 2008.


Multitouch: it's no cinch

A major usability problem that has dogged multi-touch computer interfaces
for the last twenty five years is the lack of tactile feedback. The
physical feel of the interface is something you take for granted when using
a conventional 'hard' interface, such as a keyboard. And when it's not
there, you really miss it, as users of virtual keyboards have discovered to
their cost. This issue may not even be a
'known unknown' yet for Microsoft.

Some of Apple's recent patent applications appear to be addressing this
issue. Philips, too, has demonstrated real advances - unveiling a rival
coffee table system called an 'Entertaible'.

This sophisticated table-top games system elegantly combines multi-touch
with multi-object sensing, so that physical objects, as well as many hands
and fingers, can be tracked by the 32-inch LCD playing surface.

According to the BBC, "Microsoft said it aimed to produce cheaper
versions for homes within three to five years". And despite the
sterling work of the likes of Philips et al, Microsoft have also claimed to
be "the first major technology company to bring surface computing to
market in a commercially ready product". These conflicting statements
seem to raise question marks over quite how far Microsoft have actually
got. Only time will tell whether or not these demos are just smoke,
mirrors, cameras and projectors. R

Andrew Fentem has worked in and human-computer interaction research and
hardware development for 15 years. His Spaceman Technologies is exhibiting
a reconfigurable tactile multi-touch and multi-object tracking interface at
the Kinetica Museum, the UK's electronic art museum, in London until 29
June 2007.
===

  /m

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5
* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)
SEEN-BY: 633/267
@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.