Joe Caverly wrote:
> From http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dearjoe
>
> From St Thomas Times-Journal, Page 6, January 25, 2005
>
> CAMBRIDGE, Ont. (CP) - A teacher was fired Monday after she pleaded
> guilty to having sex with a 14-year-old former student.
>
> Patricia Gaukrodger, 28, had been on leave, with pay, pending the
> outcome of the case.
>
> With the boy and his family looking on in a Cambridge courtroom,
> Gaukrodger folded her arms and shook her head slowly while she
entered
> a quilty plea to sexual exploitation.

Perhaps she regretted not getting knocked up so she could wait four
years and sue him for child support.

> In an agreed statement of facts, Crown prosecutor Sharon Nicklas said
> numerous incidents of kissing, cuddling and mutual masturbation led
to
> intercorse - in Gaukrodger's office at St. Augustine Elementary
School
> and elsewhere - by the fall of 2003.

And they call that "sexual exploitation?"  We call it statutory rape,
since the boy cannot legally consent to sex.  Of course, it's hard to
find cases where pedophilic women were actually charged with that.
It's usually the same ole' slap on the wrist, and the women act like
they're being sent to the Gulag.

Why can women never believe it when they actually get punished for
crimes?

[...]



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/26/05 6:48:10 PM ---