-=> Quoting Jean Parrot to Nancy Backus on 01-26-06  08:25 <=-

 JP> I even reread all my text before I sent the save command. I
 JP> most of the time do a speckcheller on it too. I missed that one !
 
Even with a spell-check, it probably wouldn't have caught it, ya know,
as neither address would look like a real word to it... So a quick scan
might still miss it... :)  Not a problem, of course... :)

Re: reminder up about the Y2K bug
 JP> the reason. I looked for it yesterday on the .QWK side of things
 JP> but did not see it either. Maybe it is gone !

I begin to think so.  Perhaps the bbs found a workaround that isn't
obvious to users, and so the notice was no longer necessary?

 JP>> Hat off to Richard.
 NB> On his behalf, thank you.  :)

 JP> I see that you changed your wording on this line. It was never
 JP> ambiguous to me.

I didn't think it would have been ambiguous at all, before, but when Dan
(probably in jest as usual) made an issue of it, I thought, well, maybe
it wouldn't hurt to be even less ambiguous...  

ttyl        neb

... If you wake up Sleepy & Grumpy, you must be Snow White.

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.20

--- ViaMAIL!/WC v1.60d