| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Meet Bob Klahn |
...
~>> I beliueve that I was correct in stating that there was no moderator before
~>> Roger listed it the first time. There was quite a bit of discussion WRT
~>> whether or not one was needed and Roger listed the echo with him as
~>> moderator. *That* is the listing that expired as you note above. Klahn's
~>> comments about the 'nasties' predated that original listing.
EC> There was no e-listed moderator for a couple of years,
EC> after Bobby Queen's listing expired. Hardcore fidonet
EC> junkies will argue over whether the e-listing is "official"
EC> or not, but I don't much care about that and I doubt that
EC> you do.
As long as the guy who pulls the plug recognizes it that's all
that matters.
EC> I was referring to Klahn's comments in August of 2007, and
EC> Lofaso's action of the same day. The fact that he made
EC> similar comments in January, let the subject drop after
EC> Roger listed the echo, and then RESUMED the matter just as
EC> soon as the listing expired just adds to the stench.
The fact that only one person, other than Roger, in the echo
appeared to be aware that Roger had elisted the echo, give the
lie to your insinuation.
Roger did not tell me he had listed the echo.
~>> FYI I'm not the least bit interested in having my own personal echo or
~>> in moderating one. I have been asked to co-moderate one echo and
~>> declined the offer.
EC> That is fidonet's loss but your gain. Even when I created
EC> incredibly light rules, Richard and Klahn wanted to break
EC> them, and they both gave me crap over it. And now it
Lie. You created rules specifically to allow sick and viscious
attacks on me and my family. And I do not recall you actually
posting your rules.
EC> survives simply as one of a half-dozen redundant echoes
EC> when there should be just one for political discussions --
EC> especially now as fidonet dwindles down to just a few
EC> holdouts.
There are three for political discussion I know of. All
Politics, Politically incorrect, and Debate. Then there are
three that used to be for political discussion, but they have
gone so far into flames there is little actual discussion of
anything. You moderate two of those.
BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn
... Friendly Fascism: When compassionate conservatism just isn't enough.
* Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a
* Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311)SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 18/200 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 140/1 226/0 236/150 SEEN-BY: 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1410 1418 266/1413 SEEN-BY: 280/1027 633/260 267 712/848 800/432 2222/700 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 124/311 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.