On 09/07/2019 12:47, Axel Berger wrote:
> druck wrote:
>> but instead of
>> switching to the next soon after it became closer than the current one,
>> it often used to hang on to the current one, until well past the next one.
>
> Your analysis implies your belief, that switching comes at no cost
> whatsoever. As long as the current connection is well "good enough" you
> may as well hang on and save all that overhead.

I'm well aware of the cost, but as the connection was for mobile data,
holding on to the current connection until it had an almost zero data
rate, then switching to the next one when it was already well past its
optimal data rate, was rather annoying.

---druck

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05