From: "Mark" 

Perhaps this opinion is wrong, but I see it as smart public relations
before the fact. Once they become bigger than ExxonMobil etc. the same
people that hate big oil, Halliburton etc. will start to hate them, but if
they keep their name in front of that group by paying off their favorite
media outlets, they can prevent/slow down that eventuality.


"John Beamish"  wrote in message
news:op.tka83cm4m6tn4t{at}dellblack.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com...
But I don't see how funding PBS will increase the use of Ethanol --
especially since much of it seems to be made from GM crops.  So, while I
understand your answer, it doesn't really answer my question:  what useful
target audience is ADM reaching on PBS?

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 13:56:20 -0500, Mark  wrote:

> Ethanol.
>
> "John Beamish"  wrote in message
> news:op.tj864yeem6tn4t{at}dellblack.wlfdle.phub.net.cable.rogers.com...
> They sponsor at lot of NPR and PBS stuff.  I keep asking myself:  the
> sort
> of people who know what ADM does wouldn't ever (or hardly ever) get/use
> anything from ADM so why does ADM fund NPR/PBS?
>
> On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 06:13:01 -0500, Geo  wrote:
>
>> "Mark"  wrote in message
>> news:4578f76b$1{at}w3.nls.net...
>>
>>> still want to catch the Sunday morning TV pundits on the beach -- I
>>> think
>>> though, that I'll likely pass that up and just do the AM/FM thing
>>> instead
>>
>> No big loss, the sunday morning tv pundits are just paid ADM spokesmen
>> anyway.
>>
>> Geo. (ADM=Archer Daniels Midland, they own the building where most of
>> those
>> pundits have condos..)
>>
>>
>
>

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5