-=> mark lewis wrote to Bo Simonsen <=-

 BS> Yes I can't spell.

 ml> what? TimED doesn't quote that material from the header's properly?
 ml> OB-)

Well I did wrote the reciptiant by my self! :)

 BS>>> Would you care to look in mb_qwk.c in the personal index section,
 BS>>> Max/UNIX ain't writing PERSONAL.IDX properly, but the other Index
 BS>>> files (%03x.IDX) is beeing written properly.

 WM>> ".NDX". But anyway...

 BS> Ofcause.

 ml> "of course" ;-)

Wow! It's kinda populear ;) I did recieve nearly the same message from 
my Fidonet boss! ;)

 BS>>> It should be the same structure right?

 WM>> Yes.

 WM>> OK, I'm finally going to start trying to live up to my
"Developer"
 WM>> status on the Maximus project. :-) I've grabbed the current CVS
 WM>> tree from SourceForge and built it.

 WM>> I don't see anything obviously wrong in the PERSONAL.NDX code yet,
 WM>> but I have a more basic problem: I can't get a QWK packet built at
 WM>> all here. It just segfaults as soon as I hit 'D'.

 BS> I doesn't do here.. I bet it's locally?

 ml> i've still got to try to get this thing configured and set up on the
 ml> box, here... i haven't updated it in a while, either... anything
 ml> really interesting in the CVS updates that i should
 ml> consider before really digging in and trying to learn this
 ml> thing in its non-native (ie: non-dos and/or non-os2) format?

Me and William did make a huge CVS commit yesterday, I did also correct 
some errors today (not commited yet, but in a couple of minutes it 
woyld be). 

I don't understand your last question..

Bo

... Computer Hacker wanted. Must have own axe.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.46

--- Maximus/UNIX 3.03b