Hyerdahl3 wrote:
> >Subject: Re: Where the GIRLS are
> >From: "Deborah Terreson" foodNOTSPAMandart{at}comcast.net
> >Date: 1/3/2005 12:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: 
> >
> >
> >
> >----------
> >In article , "Avenger"

> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >> But Nevada is #1 in female strippers lol
> >>
> >>
> >> "Deborah Terreson"
 wrote in
message
> >> news:y_6dnYvnv785_kXcRVn-oQ{at}comcast.com...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------
> >>> In article ,
> >> hyerdahl1{at}aol.com
> >>> (Hyerdahl1) wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > Nev. in Top 10 for Most Women Lawmakers
> >>>
> >>> Isn't Nevada also a state with legalized whorehouses?
>
> Yes, I think it is.  The working girl seems to have more rights
there.
> >>>
>  I wonder why those uppity, superior, morally straight women lawyers
and
>  legislators aren't trying to shut them down?
>
> What makes you think NV lawmakers must adopt your version of
morality, 'Deb'?
>
>  After all, protsitution is a crime against women, isn't it?
>
> Prostitution may harm women, but it's a crime against society.
Places that
> want to end prostitution arrest the Johns.  :-)  I don't think NV has
a vested
> interest in banning something that draws men to their state to
contribute
> money.
>
>  Or do you suppose they do not wish to put the poor whores out of
well paying
> >>> work and back into minimum-wage convenience-store clerk's jobs -
jobs
> >> where> they will be quite eligible to recieve the same health care
they get
> from
>  the whorehouses, from the state instead.
>
> I respect whores far more than whoremongers, 'Deb'.  Feeding oneself
and ones
> family should not be a crime, whereas whoremongering is an act of
carnality.
> The whoremonger doesn't need to rent a whore to eat or feed his
family.  He is
> the social pariah, dear.
> >>>
> >>> Oh no, can't do that, it might raise state taxes!
>
> True enough.  If NV ever really wants to curtain prostitution all
they have to
> do is arrest whoremongers and put their pictures on the 5 o'clock
news.

Sure, why not? But include also pictures of everyone convicted of
shop-lifting, hot-check writing, and insurance fraud. Public shaming is
strong deterrence but there is no reason to limit its use to guys who
pay prostitutes.



> In my state we have exposed child molesters and other sex offenders;
we could
> do that with whoremongers too.
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm. Interesting how 'victimhood' rises and ebbs with the amount
of cash
> >>> the 'victims' make... ;-)
>
> The amount of cash made may or may not inspire the victim who is
still a victim
> no matter how much cash is raked in, eh?  And a whoremonger is still
a
> whoremonger.
>
> >(edit)
> >
> >Females know they are all Ho's,
> >> it just a matter of how much.
> >>
> Much better to BE a whore than to rent one.  :-)  Whoremongers, eh?
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/29/05 9:41:15 AM ---