At 04:22 PM 10/26/02 -0700, you wrote:
>In case anyone is wondering what damaged me so badly emotionally, here
>is the text of the offending message. It was posted publicly, and if


Yes, I can imagine how that can really bum one down..

>So does this mean that you refuse to answer the questions that were
>presented in the Open Letter? You used the word "I" at least 30 times
>in your response, never once sharing the specific answers relating to
>the questions that were asked.
>
>You claim to hold a Ph.D. and have announced this on your website.
>Maybe you should put this on your site instead: Quinn Tyler Jackson,
>Ph.D.***


Quentin,  I don't know your qualifications so I can't be the judge
of what the person says is true.  However, what I can say is that
you have NOTHING to prove to him.  If he doesn't believe you,
that's HIS problem, not yours.



>***Ph.D. is from a unaccredited and non-state approved or licensed
>school. I am not really a doctor, but am pretending to be one in
>public because I hob-knob with real Ph.D.s and it makes me feel
>better. My memberships in HIGH IQ societies are another con, used to
>make people think I am some kind of genius.

Jealousy sure comes in different flavors...


>And by the way, why does it always have to be about Quinn? You have
>got the be the most self-absorbed, arrogant, self-important,
>narcissistic, pompous FAKE in the world. You are a liar, a phony, and
>a con-man Mr. Jackson and you have now been exposed for the fraudulent
>nobody that that you are.

The burden of proof lies with him, no?  I mean, unless he's 100% certain
and has proof of your academic background, I really do not think
that's a proper way of stating it.

That type of message really hurts...   I'm sorry to hear about
your encounter with such a .

Edmund

--- Rachel's Little NET2FIDO Gate v 0.9.9.8 Alpha