Hyerdahl3 wrote:
> >Subject: Re: THE MAIN DOGMA OF MODERN FEMINISM
> >From: "bluesmama" onebluesmama{at}gmail.com
> >Date: 1/15/2005 1:41 PM Pacific Standard Time
> >Message-id: 
> >
> >Ova is to gestation as sperm is to preservation? (I think I was out
> >having coffee during logic class.)
>
> I think so too.  Ova is to gestation as sperm is to nothing.  :-)
Ova and
> sperm are more alike, but men can offer nothing akin to gestation.

I never claimed to be logical. But there wouldn't be anything to
gestate without that little tadpole.

> >But I wouldn't want to raise them without my husband's strong
> male>guardianship of our family. All year long. Guess it's a good
thing I'm>not
> a bee. (But I did love that book.)
>
> I'm not a bee either.  And I only have one child left at home, but
the kids had
> both mother and father to raise them.   I do love that book, and the
sentiment
> expressed isn't about women who love strong secure men.  :-)

Aren't you implying by your bee quote that men are only marginally
necessary?



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/30/05 2:01:33 PM ---