----------
In article , "MCP"
 wrote:


> Indeed, in some cases an artificial womb might be even more safe than a
> natural womb - the risks of diseases, accidents, drugs, alcohol, pollutants,
> inadequate nutrition, etc., would all be virtually eliminated. This,
> however, is a double-edged sword: if they really could be proven more safe,
> could insurance companies and employers force women to use artificial wombs
> as the safer alternative and refuse to reimburse those who use the
> comparatively unsafe, natural method?

And what happens if there is a total catastrophe, the power goes out, a
tsunami, earthquake, tornadoes or there are 'terrorist' attacks and these
manmade systems that will no doubt be dependent on electricity suddenly are
brought ot a crashing halt?

Jars of rotting humanflesh!

Maybe we could grind it up and sell it as fertilizer?


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/30/05 10:02:53 PM ---