Hello Carol!

** On Friday 01.01.21 - 12:16, Carol Shenkenberger wrote to Martin Foster:

 CS> 1 is a 'no'.  There is no tracking on just why something someone
 CS> proposed, never made standard.

Usually, the why (with examples of usage) is present in the  
preamble of the proposal.  No?


 CS> The FTSC doesn't 'reject proposals'.  They vote on existing ones that are
 CS> in use by enough to be a standard.

Ah.. so, should the day arrive when only a minimum of 2 systems  
exist, then as long as they agree to implement any proposal, that  
becomes the new standard?  :D

--
  ../|ug

--- OpenXP 5.0.48