RS> The fully integrated one has lots of advantages tho. It only checks
RS> the non quoted text for starters. The most fully integrated ones even
RS> keep track of the checker override stuff for a particular message so
RS> if you reedit the same message you dont have to say a second time
RS> that tho a particular word looks wrong, it is what you want to include.

BG> OLX doesn't quite go that far, does it?  I can't remember now.

RS> Yep, does all of that.

FM> Eh? Not here it doesn't. OLX remembers words that you add to the
FM> user dictionary, but if you just want to skip the strange word in
FM> that particular message it doesn't remember that if you go back
FM> and re-edit that message. And it'd be a useful feature too, IMHO.

That is part of the stuff kept in memory. So it has to have the re-edit
in the same OLX session as the original edit. Happens all the time here.

I just tried it again too, a different message with quite a few specials,
mostly names of things and some abbreviations. Ked about 8. Re-edited it
to add a para on the end with a more pungent remark than usual, it never
complained about anything except another special in the new para.

It has some quite clever trick to work out whats been Ked too in a
particular message, it doesnt appear to get thrown by edits up in
the message proper or anything. Never done any careful tests on what
it keeps, its likely just a list of Ked words by particular message.
So the layout stuff doesnt matter a damn.

--- PQWK202