On 04/07/2019 10:46, druck wrote:
> On 04/07/2019 02:54, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>> On 03/07/2019 20:20, druck wrote:
>>> For the Pi, its not the headline large sequential read and write
>>> speed that's important, but the 4K random access reads and writes.
>>> Theses are vastly faster on an SSD than a hard disk, even with a USB2
>>> interface, and make a lot of difference when used as a boot disk.
>>>
>>> Running a big apt update, which does a lot of disc reads and writes,
>>> can be 3x to 5x faster with an SSD.
>>>
>>
>> Since it happens in background, who really cares?
>
> Well I had credited you with more sense than that, so I can only assume
> you are being deliberate argumentative - plonk :(
>
What about 'i have a non-critical process running in background, so I
dont care whether it takes ten minutes or 30' do you dnot understand?
I had credited you with more intelligence..
> ---drunk
--
"When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign,
that the dunces are all in confederacy against him."
Jonathan Swift.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|