Andre Lieven wrote:
> cv (cv{at}spam.net) writes:
> > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 07:57:25 -0800, bluesmama wrote:
> >
> >> _TR_ wrote:
> >>> You refuse to find Andre's collection of quotes enlightening only
> >>> because you predictably want to overlook bad press it gives to
your
> >>> religious cult.
> >>>
> >>> You profess to belong to a flock whose mandate is progressive,
> >> productive
> >>> and righteous.  These quotes show otherwise.  These quotes,
issued in
> >>> earnest by your cult's High Priestesses, show that you lot are
> >> ethically indistinguishable from the Ku Klux Klan, Afrikaner
> >> Weerstandsbeweging,
> >>> Islamist zealots, Khmer Rouge and other such whacked-out
> >> segregationist fools.
> >>>
> >>> You deserve the same "respect" that they do.
> >>
> >> All movements have extremes. Wake me up when that's news.
> >
> > You have the extreme and mainstream mixed up here. If you were to
take a
> > woman's studies course you'll study the works of the radicals
listed in
> > Andre's posts. It is the moderates who are at the fringes of
feminism.
>
> Indeed. That can also be well inferred by the *lack* of any such
moderates
> speaking for the avowwed national women's movement organisations...
>
> > Perhaps you can name some moderate feminists who are as prominent
within
> > the movement as those in Andre's list?
>
> This should be good... 
>
> Andre
>
> --
> " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
>                                     The Man Prayer, Red Green.

Do you truly want to try and match prominent man-bashing quotes with
prominent woman-bashing quotes? Toe to toe? Cause that would be
something to see.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/1/05 2:07:31 AM ---