On 31 Jan 2005 08:12:53 -0800, "Largo"  wrote:

>
>Skinner1{at}hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>
>> And Yes, I addressed Coats sensitivity earlier. I am used to that
>kind
>> of attitude. That's probably what I rail against most!!
>
>I usually do not write during the day, but this is important to me.
>First off, my apologies to Skinner for the loose term usage of "chronic
>loserguy". I meant it in the sense often used in the a.s.s. and
>soc.single pantheon of newsgroups--i.e. a man lacking the
>ability/resources to attract/retain women he finds attractive in
>return. I did not mean it in the more common pejorative sense--even
>though, upon reflection, it sure sounded like it.
>
>Again, my apologies to Skinner and anyone else taking offense. Believe
>me, I'm in the same "chronic loserguy" category.
>
>Coats

Your apology is accepted with the zeal and sincerety which it was
offered. We all make statements that upon reflection we wished we
could at very least rephrase. Would that this were the most I was
guilty of.

I don't think we are "loserguys" friend. We are just unfortunate
victums of the percentages. You can call it fate if you wish I tend to
be a bit more analytical than that so I frefer the certainty of
statistics.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/1/05 2:07:31 AM ---