It seems he couldn't rip off a piece from Jax by threatening her with
one of his endless threats of having a "MID" on her, so he's settling
for "bottom" position again with the cat, threatening that he has the
"MIDs" on the cat this time.

Is anyone getting tired of all these fantasy "MIDs" This DuckBrained
moron is holding over everyone?

And this is a near forty-year-old man(?), who probably sits 24/7 in
diapers in his Mama's basement all day, "governing" the entire
technological world of the Web, including Usenet.

God Lordy! Talk about DELUSIONAL!

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?STYPE=msgid&A=0&MSGI=%3CXnsA3E3BE192B441C9
X238BHEUFHHI5RJ791%40192.254.233.145%3E\
or
https://tinyurl.com/lgsajm6

Path:
...!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!e
u.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.etern
al-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Dustin 
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Re: Browser Ad-Blocking Is "Stealing"
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: Diesel
Lines: 42
Message-ID: 
References: 



Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 23:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="82c950c44c1460224ed0debd4bb2fb7e";
 logging-data="22582";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/r
tIffLRVXBo0FWLsmuBdkxBJDPDO5VIA="
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
X-No-Archive: yes
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/GleZ0KARDxgVEh5RKt9XbkwJys=
Bytes: 2667

"p-0''0-h the cat (ES)"  wrote in
news:9cq76ahv6epjco48umf2gh41s0a7p5821n@4ax.com:

> ha ha.

Nine substations, right? :)

You wouldn't look nearly as stupid if you'd googled what I was
writing about, instead of writing bull#### for several replies,
instead.

How did that google experience work out for you, btw? Did you enjoy
reading about those substations?

What bothered you more? The fact I was right and you'd already
accused me of writing bull####, OR seeing google confirm I was right
the whole time, and YOU WERE WRITING BULLISH?

I'd like to know which pissed you off more. :)

Say, when I post the MID of you ignoring the asic code statement, are
you going to claim you just didn't see the post and that's why you
couldn't answer the question?

Maybe if I tell you you had it confused for peeking and poking. Does
that jog your memory? Does it help you remember if I tell you I
presented the question after you deflected on the exevalid thread?

I specifically provided the code statement, by itself, without any
supporting asic commands before or after the statement. I did that on
purpose, leaving you no wiggle room; unlike exevalid where you had
alot of other asic commands to figure things out and bull#### your
way thru.

Still don't remember?


-- 
I remember I posted a comment discussing how hackers will go as far
as to profile their targets. I guess he gave one of them reason to
move him from the back-burner to the oven...
thisguy1337torrentfreak.com


--- NewsGate v1.0 gamma 2