MCP wrote:
> 1. Provide DNA testing of every child at birth before a man's name as
> > the father goes onto the certificate of birth.  Every child has a
right
> > to know his or her parentage.  Every man has a right to know his
child.

This is an interesting idea that makes women cringe.  Some harpy in
Britain even tried to make it illegal for men to get DNA tests on the
sly.  It seems some men in the UK were suspicious that they had been
duped, so they took a DNA sample, like a cup the kid has used to drink
Kool Aid, and got it DNA tested, finding out that they had in fact been
duped.  Of course, this brought a number of gravy trains to a
screeching halt, and the feminazis couldn't have that.

The thing is, the government requires proof before it will issue some
other legal documents.  Why not a birth certificate?  I can't walk into
the DMV and say, "Yeah, that's my car.  Give me a sticker.  Here's the
tax."  They won't take that.  They want proof that I own the vehicle,
and that I am who I say.  But if my girlfriend had a baby, I could walk
into the hospital and say, "Yeah, I'm the father."  Instead of asking
for proof, they would just write my name on the birth certificate.

Of course, the feminazi would make the case that the man doesn't
matter, but surely the child matters, and surely it's not in the
child's "best interests" to think that the wrong guy is his dad.

> > 2. Stop the sexual torture and mutilation of baby boys, Male
Genital
> > Mutilation, (MGM). Currently over 1,000,000 baby boys are sexually
> > tortured and maimed in the US each year. Boys deserve equal justice
> > under the law.  Men have an unalienable right to our whole body. We
> > demand criminal prosecution of sexual child abusers who mutilate
little
> > children's sex organs.

Apparently the AMA has stopped endorsing routine infant circumcision.
For all their talk of the "best interests of the child," women don't
think twice before having their own babies go under the knife.  They
never even bother to question whether there's a real reason to do it.

> > 3. Summarily dismiss justice system officials who refuse to
prosecute
> > child abusers based on the sex of the child being abused.

I think it's more based on the sex of the abuser.  A man who molests
boys will get crucified, but a woman who commits statutory rape gets a
slap on the wrist.  Women argue that the boy wanted it, but the law
doesn't say that.  The law says that a boy cannot legally consent to
sex.  Ergo, a woman who has sex with a boy commits statutory rape.
Period.  That offense has listed punishments that vary by state, so a
judge who fails to issue a sentence within the guidlines isn't doing
his job, and he should obviously be impeached.

You wouldn't employ an engineer who didn't engineer, or a painter who
never painted.  Why employ a judge who doesn't uphold the law?  The
answer is obvious.  Though we are supposed to have a government of
laws, not of women, our government does essentially what women want, to
the greatest possible extent.

[...]

> > 4. End current systematic discrimination against boys in public
school
> > enrollment, discipline, and advancement.

Can't do that.  It would offend female teachers, and we know whom the
government exists to serve.

> > 5. Make schools safe for male children's natural rambunctiousness.
> > Provide class and educational situations that allow movement,
exercise,
> > excitement and other natural boyish behavior.

Can't do that.  Women want there to be girls wherever there are boys,
and where there are girls, everything must be geared toward them,
because they are young women, and we know whom the government exists to
serve.

[...]

> > 8. Provide equal number of male teachers in schools for role models
and
> > male guidance. Restructure educational recruiting practices and
> > prejudicial accusations of men who teach to encourage more men to
be
> > teachers of our children.

This actually can be done - by increasing the amount of money paid to
teachers.  Like the government, men dedicate themselves to serving
women, and they can't do that on a teacher's salary.

[...]

> > 11. The basic human rights of children include their right of
access to
> > both of their parents.

Can't do that.  It would offend the mother, and we know whom the
government exists to serve.

[...]

> > 18. End the social slavery of men masquerading as the failed
feminist
> > social experiment called "absentee child support." It
is a form of
> > slavery of men not related to supporting children. Sending money to
pay
> > a woman for breaking up a family is not supporting a child.

Involuntary servitude can only be stopped if it is not done in support
of women.  Otherwise, you can't stop it, because ... it would offend
the mother, and we know whom the government exists to serve.

[...]

The only way to stop the government's mistreatment of men is to abolish
the institutions that carry it out.  We have a representative
government, and the more power it has, the more it will oppress men,
because a representative government always serves those who scream the
loudest.  And you know who that is.

We must revisit what the point of government is.  Locke and Jefferson,
among others, had ideas on this.  Once government goes beyond its
fundamental charter, men will get the shaft.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/31/05 6:06:11 PM ---