Tarla wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:51:54 +1300, Graham 
wrote:
>
> >Tarla wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:33:21 +1300, Graham  wrote:
> >>
> >> >Tilly wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> No doubt this will get Zohrab and his band of supporters
crowing !
> >> >
> >> >Indeed. And any other fair and reasonable person.
> >> >
> >> >That excludes the Feminists and their supporters....
> >> >
> >> >Elsewhere fathers pay child support for children that are known
not to
> >> >be theirs. That may include NZ for all I know. How's that for
insanity?
> >> >It's OK, call it Feminism, if you prefer...
> >>
> >> My father knew that my brother wasn't his son, and he still paid
child

Did someone ask about your father?

> >> support for him after my parents divorced the second time. He knew
it
> >> before they re-married. He is a kind and decent man. This was in
1957,
> >> long before Feminism.
> >
> >His choice, NOTHING TO DO WITH FEMINISM. What about those who are
forced
> >to conform to the selfish needs of a lying female?
> >
> >That's the question you female-supremacist retard.
>
> Oh, then you should have stated your question properly.

And you should have stated your non-answer more competently.

> No one has to conform to the selfish needs of a lying female.

Except a man who has been duped into compulsory child support by .....
a selfish lying female.  I know it's your nature to beg, but try not to
beg questions in a format that exists for debate.  And save this
Yorkshire-terrier yapping for your husband.

> Find your fucking balls, and quit whining.

Hey Big Bird, he has enough balls for you and two others, so find some
fucking sand, and pound it up your ass.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 1/31/05 6:06:11 PM ---