Jane Kelley wrote in a message to Alex Vasauskas:
 JK> I have been an "expert witness" in front of enough judges to
Just because you claim it, doesn't make it so.  You have
done nothing more than make unsupported assertions or denials
in anything you have posted regarding marijuana.  Considering
the false, broad statements you have made regarding the
physiological effects of marijuana, there is no reason to believe
this or any other *claim* you have made regarding your qualifications
or experience with respect to marijuana use.
Depending on the subject, being permitted to testify as an expert
witness doesn't mean that a person necessarily knows the truth --
just that they claim to have more experience in a subject
than the average person.  Moreover, even if your claim
regarding having knowledge about AA and NA were true, you
have demonstrated that you know nothing about the effects of
cannabis or any other drug on the general population that
consumes them.  Your only conclusions in this regard are
based upon generalizing from your alleged experience with NA
and AA to the rest of the world, and these conclusions are
erroneous.  So, it is likely that you have misrepresented your
connection to NA and AA and it is certain that you have no competence
regarding the general effects of drugs in general, let alone
marijuana, on the general population.
The uncontroverted evidence is that the vast majority of people who
drink alcohol or use marijuana don't have a problem with these
substances.  Your statements to the contrary demonstrate your
disingenuousness regarding matters relevant to this subject.
--- 
---------------