Heidi Graw wrote:
> >"MCP"  wrote in message
> >news:ZKoKd.5816$v8.129{at}fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> > Despite her self-proclaimed "prowess" in debate, Pork2000 can't
debate at
> > all.
>
> MCP...do you really have to spam this newsgroup with multiple
postings of

It's not spam.

> this kind?  Isn't *one* quite enough?  You can repost it *once* every
few
> days.  That's often enough to catch everyone's attention.

I've a better idea.  He should post it as often as he likes, but make
it shorter.  He can put Parg's list of fallacies on a web site, then
put a link to it in his followup posts.  Beneath the link, if he likes,
he can point out the specific fallacy Parg is using in the post, or he
can just verbally smack her up, which is always great fun.  Inclusion
of MCP's list in the soc.men FAQ would be useful.

Someone did a similar thing with the myths-and-tricks FAQ.

MCP just doesn't want newbies being turned away or wasting time
debating Carol Ann Worstall "Manitoba" Hemingway.  I might add that
some responses to Lefty are worth reading, because she's like a
springboard (and about as bright) for useful discussions between other
posters.  But one who responds to Parg should understand what she is,
and how to make use of her incoherent squawking.



--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 2/1/05 2:09:31 PM ---