From: Ad 

Rich wrote:
>    Good that you now acknowledge that the HTML is standards compliant.

Things can be standards compliant while still being crap & the Word HTML is crap.


> I'm surprised you suggest non-compliance with a hack like "if no class
> set assume MsoNormal upon rendering".  You're really being a
hypocrite here.
>

Ummm no. What use is MsoNormal except to MS crap apps which expect it?
Nothing else needs or uses it.

>    Word 2003 uses XML namespaces as you should have noticed from the
> HTML element
>

I'm not surprised you can't read because as usual you are purposefully
deficient in your understanding of the english language ie.

"A) Which Word? We're mostly on 2003 with other versions dotted
      about. "

Odd how you ignored that while wittering on about Word2k3

>
>          xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"
>     xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
>
>
> I'm surprised you haven't seen this if you have actually done any work
> on this content.  Maybe you are just lying.
>

Nope it's you who's lying through your teeth as per Rich SOP.

e.g. a simple bit of text & a small table



Some html from word

 

Some more

 

And now some bold 
and then some italic and then some
underlined

 

 

Now a table 

 


  
   

   Tab1
   
   

   Tab2
   
  
  
   
http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45)

SEEN-BY: 633/267 270

@PATH: 379/45 1 633/267


					

				
			

			

				

					SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com
				
			
		
	
				

				

					
						Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
						

						All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
						

						IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.